4 ms·
The point still stands, it shouldn't be allowed. It's a natural area for animals and it is a dangerous location. Those well trained/equipped who would normally
by cybralx 6y ago
The point still stands, it shouldn't be allowed. It's a natural area for animals and it is a dangerous location. Those well trained/equipped who would normally explore areas like this would be fine -- but this could encourage people with less experience to venture into these areas unprepared for what they will face.
That terrain in Utah is no joke and many people have gone missing in those areas.
- kortilla 6y agoThat’s a poor justification. The scenery there is already attractive enough that stupid people will already hike there.
- s1artibartfast 6y agoIt’s not a natural location for animals. It is federally managed land for camping, hunting, and 4 wheeling. Inexperienced people die venturing into nature all the time. The solution is to warn and educate people, not discourage them from enjoying the outdoors.
- JoeAltmaier 6y agoIts a big place, and only a few busy Rangers. I imagine folks can just drive in unnoticed. And die of exhaustion or dehydration once they've had a breakdown, lost their way, run out of gas or whatever. Where in that process do we have an opportunity for education? Other than the Darwin sort.
- s1artibartfast 6y agoThis is true of any wilderness. We should put a warning poster at the obvious trailheads and let the rest of the idiots die. A more aggressive strategy might involve teaching children in schools not to walk out into the desert without water, or into the ocean if you can’t swim