4 ms·
How exactly does a movers-n-packers/goods shipping company become prejudicial to the sovereignty and integrity of India let alone not be in the best interest of
by villgax 6y ago
How exactly does a movers-n-packers/goods shipping company become prejudicial to the sovereignty and integrity of India let alone not be in the best interest of the citizens? Like did they conduct a poll to ban Lalamove?
Real baller move would be to ban anything with a China built SoC, if at all hatred for China is a reason to begin with.
- damnencryption 6y agoIndia is trying to be china or to some extent US but without having the development of either of those countries.
- t_minus_3 6y agomovers-n-packers/goods shipping company is a front end to a sophisticated intelligence gathering &e spionage program of china. Just like how HUAWEI is threat to US. Nobody is dying by banning bunch of games, chill !!
- howlgarnish 6y agoI last used Lalamove to ship some furniture home from IKEA. I'm not entirely sure what the CCP wants to do with this information, but they're welcome to have it.
- t_minus_3 6y agoFor a start, your home address, Cc info. Your inside layout of the house - how amenable you are to communist propaganda by looking at the indoors of the house. On the other hand, If you are govt official or person working in defense or research - they could easily bug your house while you are there and get daily briefings. I am not saying lalamove does this - but it is a possibility, think about why US and UK are so hell bent on banning huewei. Every country has a right to secure its border. To be fair, china is not exactly a warm neighbor too . China attacked india in 1962 and recently occupied leh and ladakh region. Tibet has been occupied by china. Taiwan, Hongkong have serious concerns with china's influence. On the other hand, you will find tons of companies like lalamove in india .
- joshuaissac 6y ago> think about why US and UK are so hell bent on banning huewei The UK is not hell-bent on banning Huawei. It had initially approved Huawei hardware, and after banning them, admitted that this was due to geopolitical pressure,[1] which included US threats to reduce intelligence co-operation with the UK.[2] The US president even said that he was responsible for the UK's action.[3] 1. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/jul/18/pressure-from-trump-led-to-5g-ban-britain-tells-huawei https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/jul/18/pressure-... 2. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/31/trump-to-threaten-to-curb-intelligence-sharing-with-uk-over-huawei-ft.html https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/31/trump-to-threaten-to-curb-in... 3. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/video/2020/jul/15/trump-claims-credit-for-uk-huawei-ban-as-china-says-move-disheartening-video https://www.theguardian.com/technology/video/2020/jul/15/tru...
- sgift 6y ago> think about why US and UK are so hell bent on banning huewei. Because the US has a trade war with China and tries to rope other countries into it?
- howlgarnish 6y agoI commend your creative thinking, but the flatpacks were left in the garage and the driver never stepped foot inside.
- geodel 6y ago> Real baller move would be to ban anything with a China built SoC Right but they are not looking for a baller move. India has severely limited financial , military or technical capabilities compare to China. They can't really challenge in significant way, so banning chinese hardware, capital investment in startups or military action is out of question. Banning some phone apps and calling it a strong retaliatory move against chinese aggression is the story fed by politicians.