I think he chose the wrong verbs. pull should’ve been clone. commit should’ve been snap. push should’ve been commit. This way, clone (instead of pull) will

I think he chose the wrong verbs. pull should’ve been clone. commit should’ve been snap. push should’ve been commit. This way, clone (instead of pull) will make a local copy on your computer. This is your local working copy. When you are ready to save, you can “snap” shot it, and leave a little message. And you can do as much of this as you want. Then when you’re ready to merge it back to the primary database, then you can “commit” it. The whole concept of pull/commit/push seems nonsensical to me. As a layman, I can’t understand the importance of pull vs. push in this context. And this makes it difficult to explain to someone non-technical.