I find the idea of a single newspaper hosting a site like WikiLeaks themselves very strange. If the WSJ receives confidential information that is of value but n

I find the idea of a single newspaper hosting a site like WikiLeaks themselves very strange. If the WSJ receives confidential information that is of value but not on a topic they typically write about will the information still see the light of day? The great thing about 3rd party sites like WikiLeaks is that they provide the information and you decide if it's valuable or not. I have to say that I'm not sure why I would submit info to SafeHouse instead of just posting it online myself with an anonymous blog.