I wonder how they arrived at that number? It seems like you'd want to do something like: (max axles) = 256 - (% of missing an axle) * (number of axles) More o

I wonder how they arrived at that number? It seems like you'd want to do something like: (max axles) = 256 - (% of missing an axle) * (number of axles) More or less. (Obvs you'd have to know the chance of missing an axle - but without a reasonable guess at this it seems you couldn't really set the max value accurately)