4 ms·
Maybe the news article was being informal, or maybe they specifically wanted to carry concealed and not open. It still seems like whatever was being requested w
by jkaplowitz 6y ago
Maybe the news article was being informal, or maybe they specifically wanted to carry concealed and not open. It still seems like whatever was being requested was on behalf of the security team he was overseeing as his primary job duty at Apple.
- giantg2 6y agoIt's possible the journalist was wrong, but I believe the BSIS issues the professional license, not the sherriff. Open or concealed doesn't matter when it's for armed employment - the license from BSIS is what's needed. So it seems this was for personal CCW. Edit: Never mind. CA is super stupid and requires a state license to carry a firearm for employment but would then also require a license from the sheriff to conceal it.
- jkaplowitz 6y agoAs discussed in the other subthread, CCW and BSIS would both be needed for concealed carry executive protection in California.
- giantg2 6y agoHence my comment about not minding my comment and CA being stupid.