4 ms·
He shouldn’t have to apply for a permit in the first place. 2nd amendment should cover his needs. Having a permit process just opens up the system for corruptio
by tesmar2 6y ago
He shouldn’t have to apply for a permit in the first place. 2nd amendment should cover his needs. Having a permit process just opens up the system for corruption.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- wtvanhest 6y agoThat really isn’t the point of my comment or this case. If someone wants to challenge the constitutionality of the ccw permit, that is a different topic
- tesmar2 6y agoRight but this whole thing could have been avoided, impropriety and all, if the incentive were eliminated, which also has the tidy side effect of aligning with the spirit of the 2nd amendment. > There is no reason head of security at Apple needs to be armed That’s up to them, they can decide what kind of arms are carried.