3 ms·
> A high-level exec at one of the world's most powerful companies paying off a local LEO for a permit instead of, IDK, contacting the State or the Feds, is beyo
by wl 6y ago
> A high-level exec at one of the world's most powerful companies paying off a local LEO for a permit instead of, IDK, contacting the State or the Feds, is beyond inexplicable.
The State or the Feds don't issue CCWs in California. Chief local law enforcement officers only, which means sheriffs and police chiefs.
- throwawaygh 6y ago>> A high-level exec at one of the world's most powerful companies paying off a local LEO for a permit instead of, IDK, contacting the State or the Feds, is beyond inexplicable. > The State or the Feds don't issue CCWs in California. Chief local law enforcement officers only, which means sheriffs and police chiefs. No, but they do investigate other LEO agencies for corruption. See: the article.
- joncrane 6y agoRight, and how long is that investigation going to take. Meanwhile Apple is short dozens of security guards to have a full detail necessary to protect the lives and wellbeing of the highest ranking executives in the country. The head of security at Apple is charged with protecting the lives and wellbeing of the top execs. He performed exactly as the incentive structure recommends.
- appleflaxen 6y agoThe crime is bribery, which determines the jurisdiction is federal. Which laws were being overlooked by the bribe is not relevant.