4 ms·
I tried a blind test some time ago, 5 generated, 5 real faces, and was 100% correct. How? The generated faces have too perfect teetch, sometimes illogical chan
by cue_the_strings 6y ago
I tried a blind test some time ago, 5 generated, 5 real faces, and was 100% correct.
How? The generated faces have too perfect teetch, sometimes illogical changes in skin texture and hairiness,... But one thing really stands out on its own and I think I could be just as correct if I only relied on it.
See how all these pictures are propely lit and exposed and seem like they were taken with a decent camera? Now notice how this isn't the case with hair, especially transparent parts of loose long hair, where you see individual hairs. These parts look like they have way more noise and like they've been taken in low light with high ISO, somewhat like in a bad HDR composite. This may not work for slicked hair or bald people, yet it's pretty evident in almost all other cases.
- cue_the_strings 6y agoI'd summarize the look as: decent quality on the faces, some parts of the skin randomly smoothed (like an amateurish blemish removal filter), hair always like it was taken with a 2015 mid range cell phone with HDR (say Motorola Moto Style).