> It's anti-scientific to deny the possibility that biological gender can influence desired career paths. IMHO what is actually being claimed, and which there

> It's anti-scientific to deny the possibility that biological gender can influence desired career paths. IMHO what is actually being claimed, and which there is academic consensus based on facts around, is that sexism has been such a pervasive cultural force, to such a degree that it's difficult to parse nature versus nurture. Plus science is still working on nature vs nature - it's complex. So. Simpler to start with the known, empirically verified problem in front of our eyes.