3 ms·
Unrelated to the content: I dunno what the author/site admin has done - but that was one of the fastest loading web pages I've ever seen on my phone.
by avh02 6y ago
Unrelated to the content: I dunno what the author/site admin has done - but that was one of the fastest loading web pages I've ever seen on my phone.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- robmccoll 6y agoThere's no JavaScript and only a small number of CSS dependencies. No caching, 239kB transfer. With caching, it's only a 3.1kB transfer. Interestingly HN's front page is an order of magnitude smaller in uncached transfer size. It does include some JS, but the lower perceived snappiness seems to owe to longer round trip times (for me anyway ~60ms for HN vs ~10ms for dev.l1x.be).
- StreamBright 6y agoMostly these: Hugo / Tachyons / AWS S3 / Cloudfront / Compression The biggest impact is not to have JS and not to have a giant amount of HTML / CSS. That keeps the content very small. The syntax highlight is rendered at compile time.
- sm4rk0 6y agoYou could find this interesting: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25151773 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25151773