4 ms·

I don't think it's that hard to represent. PG already has a mechanic to disagree with Hitler's decisions e.g. Kiev and Gibraltar. You can easily imagine quandar

by zeteo 6y ago

I don't think it's that hard to represent. PG already has a mechanic to disagree with Hitler's decisions e.g. Kiev and Gibraltar. You can easily imagine quandaries such as: - "Hitler has asked you to detach units for cooperation with Einsatzgruppen operating behind the front. Refuse: lose 500 prestige Accept: gain 1000 prestige, reduced deployment area in the next scenario" - "Hitler has ordered all captured commissars to be shot. Enforce: enemies no longer retreat or surrender. Disregard: lose 500 prestige" There's also an end-of-campaign message that can easily be changed.

Pet_Ant 6y ago
That's not a moral question, that's a resource allocation question. Better to have no in game effects and let the player say "I don't want to win that way". Morality is in the end a personal choice about how you want to live.