4 ms·
I thought you were talking about performance, in which case the relevant chart is: http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/which-programming-languages-are-fastes
by uriel 15y ago
I thought you were talking about performance, in which case the relevant chart is:
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/which-programming-languages-are-fastest.php http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/which-programming-lang...
Which shows Go is well ahead of OCaml.
The "which language is best" chart you linked has rather arbitrary weighting.
- igouy 15y agoBoth pages show "performance" - they show 2 different summary statistics of "performance". > The "which language is best" chart you linked has rather arbitrary weighting. That chart has exactly the same "weighting" as the chart you say is "the relevant chart"! > Which shows Go is well ahead of OCaml. Which shows the time measurements for those programs with Go 6g and OCaml completely overlap http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/which-programming-languages-are-fastest.php?go=on&ocaml=on&calc=chart http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/which-programming-lang... The time measurements are similar for both Go 6g and OCaml - http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=go&lang2=ocaml#faster-programs-measurements http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/benchmark.php?test=all...
- igouy 15y agoDid you downvote my reply instead of trying to justify your own comments ?
- chc 15y agoYou can't downvote replies to your own comments on Hacker News, so that seems unlikely unless he's sock-puppeting.