4 ms·
From this we can safely assume their privacy approach was "lets pray no one will find our S3 buckets"
by pintxo 6y ago
From this we can safely assume their privacy approach was "lets pray no one will find our S3 buckets"
- Zenst 6y agoIt would seem that `mysterious ways` was never the best security approach. Still to impact 10M users given "It has been downloaded by more than 1 million people on Google Play, and ranks as the #24 lifestyle app in the Apple App store" does seem interesting and would love a breakdown upon that as not sure that 9M Apple app users of this. So, probably some deeper breachers of GDPR and the like going on here.
- netsharc 6y agoHah, do they have an "Add a contact to pray for" feature? A Zuckerbergian personal information hoarder/reseller would salivate at the thought of having such info.
- mfer 6y ago"Zuckerbergian personal information hoarder/reseller" I'm going to have to remember that one. Ha.
- plorg 6y agoFrom the article: "Most damningly, the cloud database included whole phone books from users. Whenever a person joins the Communities social network, the app asks if it can invite friends to join. If a user says yes, the app uploads the user’s entire ‘phonebook’ from their device, containing all contacts and associated information."
- alisonkisk 6y ago"more than 1million" just means "1-10million" or whatever the bucket boundary is in the Play UI. Don't try to read too much specifics into these broad estimates.
- fxtentacle 6y agoA reasonable choice. It is a praying app after all ;)