3 ms·
It does require a warrant to use the video as grounds to enter their neighbor's home, if the previous Supreme Court ruling holds up. More likely, they'd figure
by boomboomsubban 6y ago
It does require a warrant to use the video as grounds to enter their neighbor's home, if the previous Supreme Court ruling holds up.
More likely, they'd figure out some kind of parallel construction.
- vaccinator 6y agoparallel construction should be relabeled as perjury or something similar