3 ms·
While the point of Apple Silicon is undoubtedly for Apple to have more control over their ecosystem, this article doesn't make that point very well. For example
by square_usual 6y ago
While the point of Apple Silicon is undoubtedly for Apple to have more control over their ecosystem, this article doesn't make that point very well. For example:
> However, there’s a clear nudge for developers to publish their recompiled apps to Apple’s store.
That doesn't make any sense. Where is the "nudge" coming from? The article doesn't make any argument for how that works, given that you can share universal binaries outside the App store. Apple Silicon isn't changing anything that would "not so gently nudge" developers into the App Store.
Similarly, old apps only compiled for x86 being compatible in the future is... not really about control. PowerPC apps aren't compatible with intel Macbooks; that's just an inevitable outcome of switching the ISA. There's nothing about platform control in that.
- ratww 6y ago> That doesn't make any sense. Where is the "nudge" coming from? I had the impression that the person that wrote the article believes that Universal Binaries are an AppStore-only feature.
- square_usual 6y agoThey mention a couple of lines before that you can "share or submit [them] to the Mac App Store", so they seem to be aware that you can share Universal Binaries.