3 ms·
You have to trust their promise that their anonymous submission process is actually reasonably anonymous. Many whistleblowers probably couldn't tell between an
by mnutt 15y ago
You have to trust their promise that their anonymous submission process is actually reasonably anonymous. Many whistleblowers probably couldn't tell between an anonymous process and a seemingly anonymous process that isn't.
- hugh3 15y agoOK, but if you're going to be that paranoid you shouldn't trust Wikileaks either, right?
- mnutt 15y agoRight. But in this case trusting WSJ to keep your anonymous submission secure as well as trusting their ability to run a leaks site would be a mistake: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/06/wall-street-journal-leak-site-works-on-security-fixes/?partner=rss&emc=rss http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/06/wall-street-journal...