6 ms·
We (rsync.net) will test this out immediately - we're always happy to see tools like this that support plain old SFTP. If, for any reason, you'd like a free te
by rsync 6y ago
We (rsync.net) will test this out immediately - we're always happy to see tools like this that support plain old SFTP.
If, for any reason, you'd like a free test account, just email info@rsync.net.
Thank you for building this!
- earthscienceman 6y agoHuh. You have an "ARM" logo on your webpage, is that this ARM?? https://adc.arm.gov/armlogin/login.jsp https://adc.arm.gov/armlogin/login.jsp
- dewey 6y agoIt's the older version of their current logo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arm_Ltd https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arm_Ltd.
- earthscienceman 6y agoComputing arm, hmm. I had always seen that in lower case. Thanks!
- aptmiguk 6y agoYour pricing link appears to be down: "The requested URL /resources/regulatory/pricing.html was not found on this server."
- mekster 6y agoDo you have any recommendations on backup tools? I figured borg is stable and does the job but others, including restic have problems like memory usage concerns and I'm just a single person shop and don't have any huge assets to backup and already seeing restic/duplicacy choke consuming GBs of memory. What are the tools that are performant and stable? I'd like to at least use another implementation besides borg in case a bug corrupts the data. Encryption, retention policies, incremental backup without periodical full backup and acceptable performance (that people don't fill GitHub issues with performance problems) are requirements and deduplication is a plus.
- rsync 6y agoOur current recommendation is 'borg' and all customer feedback reinforces that choice.
- mekster 6y agoSo, you're saying there aren't any others that are as good as borg?
- seized 6y agoLook at Duplicacy. It's memory usage is reasonable for me and dev is lowering it. Also faster than Restic and fully incremental.
- mekster 6y agoI hope it gets to the point not to consume several GB soon enough. Also the pricing got too greedy and I'm not sure if I want to pay that. It used to be per user but now it's per machine and it's even asking you to pay $50/year per machine even for cheap instances that are $60/year and when you have 20 small machines to look after, the pricing looks a bit too unfair.
- bimbashrestha 6y agoJust sent you an email for a test account:) Thanks!
- seized 6y agoYou may also be interested in Duplicacy (not to be confused with Duplicity etc). Can also backup to SFTP, great dedupe features, RSA encryption, etc. https://duplicacy.com/home.html https://duplicacy.com/home.html