3 ms·
That makes sense. Part of my process is having people listen through to the interview and let me know where they get confused. Then I add in explanations there.
by agbell 6y ago
That makes sense. Part of my process is having people listen through to the interview and let me know where they get confused. Then I add in explanations there. The explanations mean people don't get lost if they don't know what punch cards are or fortan for instance.
I also think there are many straight interview podcasts and I'm trying to do something different.
- mutagen 6y agoI think your podcast and format is great, keep doing it and refining it. I look forward to listening to each new episode because of the interesting and wide ranging guests and the broader viewpoint you look for in the discussions.
- ptx 6y agoMakes sense! Maybe my confusion (which was more about the format than the topic), could be solved just by some subtle sound effect to mark the switch between you talking to the guest and you talking to the listener? Since there's no video in a podcast to give this context, the listener has to exert some effort trying to deduce it from other clues. For example, Accidental Tech Podcast inserts a small jingle at the start of a sponsor break whereas Talk Python inserts a sudden awkward silence in the conversation. It took me many episodes of the latter to stop wondering if the player had crashed, or if the interviewer lost his train of thought, or the guest was offended, etc. The jingle lets the listener know what's happening, which gives a more relaxing listing experience. So some easy way to distinguish the interview from the narration would be useful, I think. But maybe I'll be less confused once I've listened to a few more episodes. A new podcast always takes some getting used to. Thanks for making it!