5 ms·
> For me this watch is nearly perfect. The UX is poor though. Once you've finished with the stopwatch, the next mode-button press leads to the time-adjustment
by dingaling 6y ago
> For me this watch is nearly perfect.
The UX is poor though. Once you've finished with the stopwatch, the next mode-button press leads to the time-adjustment mode rather than immediately back to the current time display. Any destructive modes such as adjustment should be protected behind a long-press, not interleaved into the routine mode cycle.
It's also frustratingly easy to knock the watch out of 24 hour display with a slight mistouch.
It is marvellously thin and light though, I wish there were more options of a similar form factor.
- kennywinker 6y agoalso very easy to switch the alarm on, only for it to go off at an inappropriate time
- ndiddy 6y agoIf you use the stopwatch, the mode button goes back to the current time display. I don't see an issue.
- serf 6y agoParent to your comment mentioned that they like the watch because it's thin, light, shows time and date. You commented that the UX is poor because of the way the stop watch works. That user, if they're using the watch for the time and date, never experiences the stopwatch UX. To them, the UX is superb for what they do. >The UX is poor though. for you.
- nemetroid 6y ago> Once you've finished with the stopwatch, the next mode-button press leads to the time-adjustment mode rather than immediately back to the current time display. This is incorrect. If you’ve interacted with a mode, the mode button always takes you back to the current time display.