4 ms·

I dunno. For me this watch is nearly perfect. It's incredibly thin, lightweight, waterproof. It shows the time, day and date. The battery will last for 7-10 yea

I dunno. For me this watch is nearly perfect. It's incredibly thin, lightweight, waterproof. It shows the time, day and date. The battery will last for 7-10 years. I can wear it day and night and never have to take it off or do anything for it. I have a collection of other watches including Apple watches and Swiss mechanical watches. None of them are as practical and hassle-free as this watch.

mino 6y ago
This. I never have to take it off. Battery lasts forever, lightweight, thin, accurate (despite it lacks radio synch), extremely cheap.
- emme 6y ago
  I'm happy with mine, but it gains ~1s each day w.r.t. the national radio clock signal. I normally adjust it every couple of days.
dingaling 6y ago
> For me this watch is nearly perfect. The UX is poor though. Once you've finished with the stopwatch, the next mode-button press leads to the time-adjustment mode rather than immediately back to the current time display. Any destructive modes such as adjustment should be protected behind a long-press, not interleaved into the routine mode cycle. It's also frustratingly easy to knock the watch out of 24 hour display with a slight mistouch. It is marvellously thin and light though, I wish there were more options of a similar form factor.
- kennywinker 6y ago
  also very easy to switch the alarm on, only for it to go off at an inappropriate time
- ndiddy 6y ago
  If you use the stopwatch, the mode button goes back to the current time display. I don't see an issue.
- serf 6y ago
  Parent to your comment mentioned that they like the watch because it's thin, light, shows time and date. You commented that the UX is poor because of the way the stop watch works. That user, if they're using the watch for the time and date, never experiences the stopwatch UX. To them, the UX is superb for what they do. >The UX is poor though. for you.
- nemetroid 6y ago
  > Once you've finished with the stopwatch, the next mode-button press leads to the time-adjustment mode rather than immediately back to the current time display. This is incorrect. If you’ve interacted with a mode, the mode button always takes you back to the current time display.

mino 6y ago

This. I never have to take it off. Battery lasts forever, lightweight, thin, accurate (despite it lacks radio synch), extremely cheap.

emme 6y ago
I'm happy with mine, but it gains ~1s each day w.r.t. the national radio clock signal. I normally adjust it every couple of days.

dingaling 6y ago

> For me this watch is nearly perfect. The UX is poor though. Once you've finished with the stopwatch, the next mode-button press leads to the time-adjustment mode rather than immediately back to the current time display. Any destructive modes such as adjustment should be protected behind a long-press, not interleaved into the routine mode cycle. It's also frustratingly easy to knock the watch out of 24 hour display with a slight mistouch. It is marvellously thin and light though, I wish there were more options of a similar form factor.

kennywinker 6y ago
also very easy to switch the alarm on, only for it to go off at an inappropriate time
ndiddy 6y ago
If you use the stopwatch, the mode button goes back to the current time display. I don't see an issue.
serf 6y ago
Parent to your comment mentioned that they like the watch because it's thin, light, shows time and date. You commented that the UX is poor because of the way the stop watch works. That user, if they're using the watch for the time and date, never experiences the stopwatch UX. To them, the UX is superb for what they do. >The UX is poor though. for you.
nemetroid 6y ago
> Once you've finished with the stopwatch, the next mode-button press leads to the time-adjustment mode rather than immediately back to the current time display. This is incorrect. If you’ve interacted with a mode, the mode button always takes you back to the current time display.