4 ms·
I always tell the same stories in these comments, excuse me if you've read this before... When I started at university (in the uk, top 10 but not top 5), the a
by LatteLazy 6y ago
I always tell the same stories in these comments, excuse me if you've read this before...
When I started at university (in the uk, top 10 but not top 5), the admissions tutor (for the school of physics, not the whole place) who admitted my year group was forced to do the job. He considered himself a scientist (he was an FRS, a leader in his field after all). He looked at all the factors used for entry and found them all to be bs. Grades (predicted and actual), personal statements, references, extra curriculars, age/gender/socioeconomic group etc.
So he admitted everyone that applied.
He admitted people with low grades, he admitted people without the maths requirements (usually the most important grade for a physics under grad, you generally can't do any physics course without one).
The result was a bumper class of 120ish instead of the usual 60ish. But by the end of the first year / start of second year, we were down to the usual number. Everyone else had transfered out, failed and left or was repeating the year.
The interesting thing was that there were a few of the people who wouldn't usually have made it who did not transfer out. 2 of the 10 without the maths qualifications went on the get degrees. 1 is a teacher, the other got a PhD.
His philosophy was that if someone could pass first year exams, labs, etc they deserved a spot in second year and so on. He didn't care what they came with. Just whether they passed. The chance he gave people was mostly wasted. But not entirely. He radically improved some people's lives.
I only know because we got drunk together because he was my tutor and we had a very friendly tutorial group and relationship.
As a straight A student with good extra curriculum activities, references, even work experience, I was scandalised and insulted to hear what he'd done. But I learned new definition of equality and it challenged me as a person. I think a lot of schools in particular work the other way around: hard to get in, then you just sit there for a few years and walk into jobs without further examination. That helps no one.
- ardit33 6y agoI feel that's what community colleges should be.. I went in high school in Virginia, and I know smart people, that wanted to stay close to home, for family reasons, and they went to community college. The mix of a community college is mix of very smart students, average folks, to straight up dummies.... but at least they have a second chance to perform well. Some one that does well, in a community college, should be transfered into a proper 4 year college. I know a lot of state schools do this, but it should be more common/normalized. Plus community colleges tend to be much cheaper.
- bradlys 6y ago> Some one that does well, in a community college, should be transfered into a proper 4 year college. I know a lot of state schools do this, but it should be more common/normalized. As far as I know, this is radically common. Where are you from that this isn’t common? Most everyone goes to community college as prep for getting a four year degree later or do some particular 2 year program. I rarely meet people who do a two year associates just for the sake of it. (As it usually means very little in the marketplace) Usually the people who quit at two years never really could figure out what they wanted to do. (Which is fine)