I've seen this and agree with you. Though, if the nature of your QA teams led to worse quality, you might want to find a term other than "strong" to describe t

I've seen this and agree with you. Though, if the nature of your QA teams led to worse quality, you might want to find a term other than "strong" to describe them. Because "strong" implies you want more of that, which isn't what you meant at all. Perhaps "dominant"?