I'm pretty sure I agree with that, but I'm not sure the OP would. From the article: > Filmmakers were not content to make movies with video cameras until those

I'm pretty sure I agree with that, but I'm not sure the OP would. From the article: > Filmmakers were not content to make movies with video cameras until those cameras could shoot 24p, because video, with its many-frames-per-second, looks like reality, like the evening news, like a live broadcast or a daytime soap opera; whereas 24p film, by showing us less, looks somehow larger than life, like a dream, like a story being told rather than an event being documented. This seemingly technical issue turns out to have an enoumous emotional effect on the viewer. It is a minor point in the article that is pretty orthogonal to this actual discussion.