4 ms·
> No, damage control or image management in no way implies a Company or PR department. Any group can engage in these activities. Later you point out, the OP app
by tlamponi 6y ago
> No, damage control or image management in no way implies a Company or PR department. Any group can engage in these activities. Later you point out, the OP appears to be affiliated with Debian.
1. I said it seems he is affiliated, but anybody can nick name himself a variant of "debian developer" in any forum.
2. It implies that a formal body of the organisation, that can be a single person like the DPL, else it's not damage control by Debian like you suggest, but that of a single person - which can hardly be framed as damage control in this case, the blog did clearly refer to Debian as a whole, not a single person.
> I am not expecting the OP to solve the problems, but I am suggesting that it would be more constructive to comment [...]
That's what you say now, but not what you said originally. As said, change needs to come from Debian within, not some HN discussions - talk is cheap.
Thanks for the constructive down vote, though ;-)
- zepto 6y ago“...else it's not damage control by Debian like you suggest” Nowhere did I suggest Debian was doing damage control. You are simply misrepresenting me. “That’s what you say now, but not what you said originally” Another misrepresentation. What I said originally, and my follow up comment are perfectly consistent. I’m curious why you feel such a strong need to defend DebianDev and deny that there is any damage control happening.