4 ms·
I think the common interpretation is that a living person fraudulently used the identity of a dead person to cast an illegal ballot.
by chordalkeyboard 6y ago
I think the common interpretation is that a living person fraudulently used the identity of a dead person to cast an illegal ballot.
- mcphage 6y agoYes, but how did they know that it wasn’t just a living person casting a ballot normally?
- chordalkeyboard 6y agoPresumably they matched the name, location, and DOB with a person who had a public obituary. I'm not the op so I don't know.
- mcphage 6y agoThat isn’t an accurate system—so if that’s all they were doing, they really shouldn’t be making claims they can’t support.
- chordalkeyboard 6y agoI'm sure its not foolproof but it clearly raises suspicion. How many people are born on the same date with the same name?