3 ms·
Although I agree that "www" isn't really needed, this is one of those conventions that should have been corrected on day 1 or not at all. To change it now only
by makecheck 18y ago
Although I agree that "www" isn't really needed, this is one of those conventions that should have been corrected on day 1 or not at all. To change it now only invites people to encounter more errors than necessary.
There's no way 100% of web sites will change to this. So maybe half the time I'll get an error if I get in the habit of writing web page links to use "xyz.com" instead of "www.xyz.com", or typing them as such in my browser.
Conversely, no business in its right mind would accept only "mybusiness.com", scaring customers away by returning an error for "www.mybusiness.com". Of course they'll accept both, so why not use the one that's sure to work?