3 ms·
Lmao who is this "terrifying" for? Google stock holders?
by BjorksEgo 6y ago
Lmao who is this "terrifying" for? Google stock holders?
- easytiger 6y agoYou like this because it harms Google. I get it. But the principle and it's implications you have considered deeply and have no issue with them?
- WhoCaresLies 6y agoExactly, it seems people take strong opinion only just to defend their stocks, it reminds me of the $TSLA fanboiz
- _threads 6y agoAhah yes « We want to use content created by others but not pay for it, we offer visibility but it’s not our problem how they monetize it »
- MR4D 6y agoOr maybe ANY other company that ever wants to use snippets online. This is a classic tactic - pick a fight with the baddest dude in the room and take him down, then nobody else will challenge you. Google was the baddest dude in town, and now nobody will challenge this law. Which, rather ironically, means that Google will have FEWER challengers in the future. So, yeah, “terrifying” is a perfect word for the OP to use here.