3 ms·
You could add a queue and execute the queries one at a time. Probably SQLite or at least popular wrappers for it already do this? But it will be slower than a D
by dmurray 6y ago
You could add a queue and execute the queries one at a time. Probably SQLite or at least popular wrappers for it already do this? But it will be slower than a DBMS that allows you to make hundreds of queries in parallel.
- blackrock 6y agoDidn’t SQLite say that their lock/unlock process is really fast? Such that it doesn’t really pose a significant drawback.