Right, I can’t possibly see what bearing the the extravagant fruits of her labor (fraud) has to do with the act of committing it. I guess she just did it out of

Right, I can’t possibly see what bearing the the extravagant fruits of her labor (fraud) has to do with the act of committing it. I guess she just did it out of the kindness of her heart? What. Like I’m not even understand what the benefit of making that argument is, as far as building a case/persuading a jury goes. Yes if the prosecution leans in to it, it paints her as more of a cartoon villain, but still, it’s not like it’s hard to understand why people commit fraud in the first place (personal gain).