2 ms·

Relevant: https://adnauseam.io/ https://adnauseam.io/

• eindiran 6y ago
  The book "Obfuscation" shown at the bottom of the page is a very interesting one, definitely worth taking a look at. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/obfuscation https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/obfuscation
• deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]
• boogies 6y ago
  +1 for the best WebExtension ad blocker there is, a fork of №2 µblock Origin
• surround 6y ago
  Unfortunately, adnaseam does not improve privacy since it has to load the ad scripts.
  • sixstringtheory 6y ago
    Are there any servers running the software whose maintainers accept donations to continue/augment their operation?
  • boogies 6y ago
    Addressed by the FAQ¹: > Isn't it safer just to use an adblocker? Why engage with ad-networks at all? > While AdNauseam is far safer than using no blocker at all, it is indeed marginally safer for one to simply use a strong adblocker and protect themselves. But it is also safer to stay at home rather than to attend a protest. Using an adblocker does little to change the status quo (especially for those users without the resources to install/configure one, and so remain at risk). AdNauseam, and the obfuscation strategy in general, instead presents a possible avenue for collective resistance; a means of questioning and perhaps eventually, changing the system. But this is not for everyone. If your goal is primarily self-protection, this tool may not be for you... [1]: https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam/wiki/FAQ#isnt-it-safer-just-to-use-an-adblocker-why-engage-with-ad-networks-at-all https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam/wiki/FAQ#isnt-it-safer-ju...
• dymax78 6y ago
  How would you (or anyone) rate this vs uBlock Origin? Seems like by it's inherent design, AdNauseam would use greater resources.