3 ms·
Good questions. 1. Precisely because it felt like a good middle ground between the two. MIT/Apache feels like completely giving away something which doesn't se
by pheelicks 6y ago
Good questions.
1. Precisely because it felt like a good middle ground between the two. MIT/Apache feels like completely giving away something which doesn't seem fair, while GPL would put some people off. MPLv2 is GPL compatible so that won't stop anyone.
2. Yes, well, will see how it turns out. One strong counterexample in this space would be Mapbox, their client code is open-source and this doesn't seem to do them any harm
3. https://www.pheelicks.com/ https://www.pheelicks.com/