3 ms·
He's not arguing that 24fps is the only good way to make movies, he's arguing that the only good way to render movies previously shot at 24fps is by using a n*2
by lloeki 16y ago
He's not arguing that 24fps is the only good way to make movies, he's arguing that the only good way to render movies previously shot at 24fps is by using a n*24Hz refresh rate.
- macrael 16y agoI'm pretty sure I agree with that, but I'm not sure the OP would. From the article: > Filmmakers were not content to make movies with video cameras until those cameras could shoot 24p, because video, with its many-frames-per-second, looks like reality, like the evening news, like a live broadcast or a daytime soap opera; whereas 24p film, by showing us less, looks somehow larger than life, like a dream, like a story being told rather than an event being documented. This seemingly technical issue turns out to have an enoumous emotional effect on the viewer. It is a minor point in the article that is pretty orthogonal to this actual discussion.