3 ms·
Same with "readable syntax". Nobody sets out to design something deliberately unreadable. It usually means that it conforms to the author's personal flavours an
by ketralnis 6y ago
Same with "readable syntax". Nobody sets out to design something deliberately unreadable. It usually means that it conforms to the author's personal flavours and there's nothing wrong with that but the implied "everything else is unreadable" subtweet doesn't really help anything. Case in point:
each planets() (planet){
println("Hello " + planet + "!");
}
I bet that the double () () here leads to some pretty unreadable code outside of this happy path. But that's just my opinion, not some objective truth
- jkcxn 6y agoNot to mention keywords such as ret, inl, imm, mut, mat and even yon - 'readable' is certainly subjective. Not to dissuade anybody from trying anything outside the norm but I wonder if calling it readable is accurate.