> The word doesn't lose meaning, unless you insist on what religion means circa ±2000 was the ultimate definition, and no previous or future meanings can ever b

> The word doesn't lose meaning, unless you insist on what religion means circa ±2000 was the ultimate definition, and no previous or future meanings can ever be correct. That's dodging the issue, which is that if you are going to argue that secular humaninsm is identical with christianity, then logically, you must accept that christianity is identical with secular humanism: No God, no creation, no Trinity, Christ is not the son of God in any sense... and if you do, then all the explicitly theological and christian concepts can be stripped out with Occam's razor.