> The point is that even if we go to a ~70% wind model, we will _STILL_BE_WORSE_OFF_THAN_FRANCE_WAS_40_YEARS_AGO_. No.[1] Denmark has about 48% of their energ

> The point is that even if we go to a ~70% wind model, we will _STILL_BE_WORSE_OFF_THAN_FRANCE_WAS_40_YEARS_AGO_. No.[1] Denmark has about 48% of their energy from wind, and their per capita carbon emissions are at the same level as in 1960.[2] Ireland with 33% is at the same level as in 1980.[3] Portugal with 27% now has the same emissions as 1990.[4] There is a trend here. > I don't get why this is so hard to understand for all those down voters. You are ignoring data that doesn't agree with your hypothesis. [1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/217804/wind-energy-penetration-by-country/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/217804/wind-energy-penet... [2] https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC?locations=DK https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC?location... [3] https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC?locations=IE https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC?location... [4] https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC?locations=PT https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC?location...