7 ms·
[2013] This has made the rounds on HN several times already. 153 comments - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16254569 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id
by Karawebnetwork 6y ago
[2013]
This has made the rounds on HN several times already.
153 comments - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16254569 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16254569
129 comments - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6718067 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6718067
- mekkkkkk 6y agoHow does it matter? If it gets rediscovered and is found interesting today, why is that bad? It's clearly dated, and if it was uninteresting it would simply die.
- Raphmedia 6y agoNot necessarily bad other than the fact that the 2020 web is quite different to the 2013 one. It can also be worth looking at the top comments of the previous posts.
- WhoIsSatoshi 6y agoI was thinking something similar - these days really valuable contents seem to resurface from a few years back. Two days ago I was reading a blog post from 2012 which I though was worthwhile. Walden's Thoreau states that 'Books are the treasured wealth of the world and the fit inheritance of generations and nations.' => I believe that we are lacking the commitment that one had to put into a project such intent as a book then with the current fastfood social medial / article generation. I also believe that in its place, a hybrid of sorts will come and surface softly back multiple time to underline the impact it left on the collective unconscious. This sounds like what we're seeing.