2 ms·
And now you are changing your claim, showing, quite frankly, that I was right. Your original claim was bogus. Furthermore, your new claim is also nonsensical.
by winstonewert 6y ago
And now you are changing your claim, showing, quite frankly, that I was right. Your original claim was bogus.
Furthermore, your new claim is also nonsensical. The fact that I don't have to use all the advanced features of my languages doesn't alter the complexity of the language.
- mb7733 6y agoI'm not sure what you mean by my claims. I'm just saying there is a big difference between adding features to the language and adding features to the type system.
- winstonewert 6y agoYou said "How could typescript be approaching C++ complexity when it's just JS with types?" The implication being an assertion that typescript cannot be getting as complicated as C++, and that's simply isn't true. Given that the type system is part of a language, I have no idea what you mean by trying to draw a big distinction between adding features to a language and a language's typesystem.