The article takes an absurd angle at "fragility". It assumes that Linux distributions do not exist and we deploy applications by coping an executable around li

The article takes an absurd angle at "fragility". It assumes that Linux distributions do not exist and we deploy applications by coping an executable around like people did in 1980. In reality I never had such "fragility" problem around Python. Some distributions did an excellent job at ensuring that all the dependencies are met at build time and that the build is deterministic and reproducible. And that the same dependencies will be available for 5+ years without breaking changes - while also receiving security fixes.