4 ms·
And that's exactly the point. Once it launches it either crashed down or stays up. As for this vaccine it got 30k tests. It's the equivalent of before launching
by unnouinceput 6y ago
And that's exactly the point. Once it launches it either crashed down or stays up. As for this vaccine it got 30k tests. It's the equivalent of before launching said bridge the entire heavy machinery of the construction company stood on it and didn't collapsed.
- tosseuthansia 6y agoThats quite wrong. Bridges with serious design flaws can stay standing for quite some time and then collapse. Any civil engineering structure can. I mean, the tower of Pisa is a great example. Serious design flaw: building a structure on a flawed foundation (technically the soil is the problem). The structure stands for centuries, but the inevitability of its collapse is certain until the Italians righted it and strengthened the base.
- brobdingnagians 6y agoThe Italian bridge that collapsed after decades because of faulty assumptions about the concrete involved is a more accurate comparison. Assuming we know more than we do, and thinking it has no serious side effects because non have appeared in the first few months is not logically consistent.