3 ms·
I’ve been using btrfs for about two years now on my primary machine. Single disk, btrfs-on-luks, on a 970 evo plus. I have never had any stability issues, and
by maddyboo 6y ago
I’ve been using btrfs for about two years now on my primary machine. Single disk, btrfs-on-luks, on a 970 evo plus. I have never had any stability issues, and as far as I can tell performance is excellent.
I’m not taking any chances, though, seeing as it is “unstable” – I’ve got snapshots and local and remote backups set up and working flawlessly. It’s sooo awesome to be able to pluck older versions of any file on my system whenever I want, and it’s saved me numerous times.
I haven’t tried zfs but I really have no need to. Btrfs does the job for me.
- machawinka 6y agoI have a similar setup. It all works perfectly until the disk starts filling up. At 95% performance goes down the cliff. You have to clean the disk and defrag. Running 4yo version, I would guess things might have improved since.
- maddyboo 6y agoThis is true. I’ve had it happen a few times too. I try to keep an eye on disk usage and purge things if it gets too high.