Yes you’re correct it was normal Solaris 10, this was about 12 years ago. On my evaluation I was comparing with a satabeast and hp320s at the time, and I said t

Yes you’re correct it was normal Solaris 10, this was about 12 years ago. On my evaluation I was comparing with a satabeast and hp320s at the time, and I said that “zfs probably outweighs the problems of running Solaris” The box was still in use in 2012, we were having issues and a “zfs upgrade” was suggested, but at that point we were adding new storage on linux.