3 ms·
So, I read correctly, these are microbenchmarks, ran 5 times each (it's not specified)? Also anyone notice the extreme performance difference for non-CPU-bound
by fock 6y ago
So, I read correctly, these are microbenchmarks, ran 5 times each (it's not specified)? Also anyone notice the extreme performance difference for non-CPU-bound things (like: DNS-lookup).
I'm still unconvinced and wait for some good old BLAS...
- wingi 6y agome too.
- fock 6y agoanswering to myself: https://www.anandtech.com/show/16252/mac-mini-apple-m1-tested/5 https://www.anandtech.com/show/16252/mac-mini-apple-m1-teste... that's SPEC at least and most interesting, now the non-Mobile A14 is not beating the old guard x86 y magnitudes (which you saw people telling below the A13 article on the same site and respective HN-posts). It's certainly superfast in singlecore, but it's telling that multicore is benchmarked vs. mobile processors (and not vs. the normal Ryzens/Intels which you can expect in a corded setup nowadays!). As for the linked microbenchmarks: I guess with 12MB of cache, there's plenty of memory to place the kernel and some other stuff. I wonder, how this plays out here.