3 ms·
Thanks. The names themselves are a little too long but seem a good source of what to start with. E.g. I would take UntidyWelloffBellfrog and remove parts of it
by qwerty456127 6y ago
Thanks. The names themselves are a little too long but seem a good source of what to start with. E.g. I would take UntidyWelloffBellfrog and remove parts of it to get Udyber or Tyllog. Somewhat sad fact: neither of these semi-random letter combinations actually is not an existing word - googling them yields quite a long list of occurrences. And there even is a GitHub user named Bellfrog already.
- TeMPOraL 6y ago> neither of these semi-random letter combinations actually is not an existing word I think that's the point of that UID scheme, though - to make them easier to remember than the usual ?v=a1Vp87d_x or whatnot. But then, two-word names could work as codenames for project. Untidy Bellfrog sounds nice.
- qwerty456127 6y agoNo, what I mean is not about this. I just mean it's so hard to find totally non-existent, let alone real unused words that even seemingly-random letter combinations turn out to be known words in some languages. For example I've used UntidyWelloffBellfrog just as a "seed" to remove random parts and get Udyber and Tyllog look more concise to me and which I would expect to be non-existent words. Yet it turns out these words exist and can be found all over the Internet.