3 ms·
Yes, this is indeed something I would like to add in the future. While adding different radix kernels support for small prime factors is not that hard, writing
by DTolm 6y ago
Yes, this is indeed something I would like to add in the future. While adding different radix kernels support for small prime factors is not that hard, writing efficient scheduler is a much more challenging task (each sequence, even for power of 2 now is split differently targeting different architectures to optimize performance).
The Bluestein's algorithm typically used for arbitrary prime sizes requires both zero-padding and convolutions support which are already efficiently implemented, so it is also not completely out of reach.