> You sure like the phrase “conspiracy theory”. That's exactly what you're pushing: a theory of how some people have conspired to do something. Is this not tru

> You sure like the phrase “conspiracy theory”. That's exactly what you're pushing: a theory of how some people have conspired to do something. Is this not true? Is this not the essence of all these outlandish and baseless theories on how there were people conspiring to rig the US presidential elections? If you disagree, please do point out exactly which part of your argument does not involve neither a conspiracy nor theories.