8 ms·
I agree with the sentiment of the article and the extreme usability of FP. It was easy for anyone to create a website for recipes or knitting designs and to pub
by cmroanirgo 6y ago
I agree with the sentiment of the article and the extreme usability of FP. It was easy for anyone to create a website for recipes or knitting designs and to publish it to your corner of the web.
For the longest time, I've felt that an open source project that basically mimicked it would be a great idea. (And for all those widgets, it should be easy to have those operate in asp.net or php... Bring back the page counter!)
For all those static site generators out there (I've written 4), I'd still use a FP clone that edited HTML, rather than markdown, or other.
The closest thing seems to be WordPress, but it lacks one fundamental thing: it's not a desktop app, and requires server config (db and user login).
I think it fair to state that with the demise of FP, (& then flash), the web became too 'professional' as the grandma and 10yo were pushed aside for the semantic web. I still feel strongly that it can all come back with a nice desktop app that worked offline.
- freeone3000 6y agoThe form factor for a casual user is no longer a nice desktop app that works offline - it would now take the form of an online website with a good mobile interface. This is filled by wix, and other sitepage generators like it.
- chungus_khan 6y agoThat, and for better or worse, Wordpress. A lot of things that used to have been frontpage sites became Wordpress sites of varying quality and maintenance.
- noident 6y agoI would say for the better - it's the only thing keeping RSS alive. Although I will also say that having to administer a database is overkill for most use cases.