Agree. Wikipedia's "philosophy" implies neutrality of each article. If someone finds in article some kind of propaganda or any facts that seem to be false, he c

Agree. Wikipedia's "philosophy" implies neutrality of each article. If someone finds in article some kind of propaganda or any facts that seem to be false, he can easily remove/change doubtful data after checking its origins. But on the other hand when you read some article on wikipedia, you just haven't enough time to verify each origin or even to think about the truth of the article.