3 ms·
Don't forget the people than need to clean up the typos from the non-syntetic-sugar - aka "keep it native" - guys, and pay the salaries for work that takes 3 ti
by grimen 15y ago
Don't forget the people than need to clean up the typos from the non-syntetic-sugar - aka "keep it native" - guys, and pay the salaries for work that takes 3 times longer just becuase of some weird principles. The best thing with this is that it's optional, and if you get into a project with HAML/SASS you can convert 1:1 back and forth so...not a big deal.
- rimantas 15y agoDon't forget the people than need to clean up the typos from the non-syntetic-sugar - aka "keep it native" - guys HAML has some features which prevent from making typos when typing code? Interesting. Anyway, I am not sure what typos are you talking about. Syntax-highlighting + validation is good enough combination for me to avoid typos. Honestly, never had that problem. and pay the salaries for work that takes 3 times longer Why would it take three times longer? I do produce my HTML manually, but that does not mean I type every single character in the code by hand. Snippets, Zen-coding/Sparkup, autocomplete, etc.—all this allows to produce HTML fast, efficiently and avoid syntax errors.
- grimen 15y ago"Honestly, never had that problem." Most common problem with manually generated XML/HTML is broken tags (not closed correctly). "Why would it take three times longer?" The number 3 is just picked by me based on my own experience - I finish views way faster than the ones I've worked with, with best-pratice semantics. If you write valid semantic HTML as fast as me with no tool you are just very good, but you don't represent the majority.