3 ms·

What specifically is factually incorrect? Please link me your "correct" sources.

• dragonwriter 6y ago
  > What specifically is factually incorrect? The claim that the court prohibited Newsome from issuing any more Executive Orders. It only prohibited him from issuing EOs that do what was in dispute in the case, specifically, using the Emergency Services Act as a basis for any order which "amends, alters, or changes existing statutory law or makes new statutory law or legislative policy." EOs which don't do that, which is the case for most EOs, are not in dispute and future EOs that don't do that are unaffected. > Please link me your "correct" sources. The actual order: https://www.suttercourts.com/sites/default/files/press_releases/Gallagher%20and%20Kiley%20v.%20Newsom.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2uvK7IgwBFlzRurE_XuyNbjg2lBrWJBItB491qbSCU6rUupx0ZxB3Qqds https://www.suttercourts.com/sites/default/files/press_relea...